Table 7: Patella resurfacing versus non-resurfacing: study details and qualitative outcomes


Table 7: Patella resurfacing versus non-resurfacing:  study details and qualitative outcomes


 













































































Study


n treatment/ control


Comparison


Supplemental


analgesic


VAS scores and type of pain, where specified


Time to first analgesic request


Use of supplemental analgesic


Other important outcomes


Barrack 1997


(LoE 1)


58/60


Patella resurfaced (PRes) vs. patella retained (Cont)


Not reported


__


__


__


Pain


Knee Society Pain score: NS at 2–4 years follow-up; patellofemoral pain postop: NS


Functional outcomes


Knee Society Function score: NS at 2–4 years follow-up; mean range of movement: NS; ability to exit car, rise from chair and climb stairs: NS


Barrack 2001


(LoE 1)


(follow-up to Barrack 1997)


44/44


Patella resurfaced (PRes) vs. patella retained (Cont)


Not reported


__


__


__


Pain


Knee Society Pain score: NS at 5–7 years follow-up; anterior knee pain postop: NS


Functional outcomes


Knee Society Function score: NS at 5–7 years follow-up; mean range of movement: NS at 5–7 years follow-up; ability to exit car, rise from chair and climb stairs: NS


Burnett 2004


(LoE 1)


42/48


Patella resurfaced (PRes) vs. patella retained (Cont)


Not reported


__


__


__


Pain


Knee Society Pain score: NS at most recent follow up


Anterior knee pain incidence at 10 years follow up: NS; anterior knee pain severity at 10 years follow up: NS


Functional outcomes


Knee Society Function score: NS at most recent follow up; range of motion: NS at most recent follow up; stair climbing: NS at 10 years follow up; flexion strength NS at most recent follow up


Re-operation


NS                                 


Mayman 2003


(LoE 1)


50/50


Patella resurfaced (PRes) vs. patella retained (Cont)


Not reported


__


__


__


Pain


Knee Society Pain score: NS at 8- to 10-year follow up


PRes superior for % of patients with pain when walking (p=0.039) and when climbing stairs (p=0.042) at 8- to 10-year follow-up


Functional outcomes


Knee Society Clinical Rating System: clinical rating Cont> PRes at 2 years, NS at all other time points up to 10 years


 


Partio 1995


(LoE 1)


47/48


Patella resurfaced (PRes) vs. patella not resurfaced (Cont)


Not reported


__


__


__


Pain


Pain (mild or moderate) on compression/ grinding of patella: PRes superior (8% vs. 46%) at 30 months follow up (p<0.01); Knee Society Pain score: NS at most recent follow up


Functional outcomes


Knee Society Function score: NS at most recent follow up; range of movement: NS at 30 months follow up


Waters 2003


(LoE 1)


243/231


Patella resurfaced (PRes) vs. patella not resurfaced (Cont)


Not reported


__


__


__


Pain


Anterior knee pain prevalence: PRes superior (p<0.0001) (regardless of posterior cruciate ligament sacrifice or not and regardless of whether osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis); mean knee score: PRes superior (p=0.0099) in osteoarthritis group, but NS in rheumatoid arthritis group


Functional outcomes


Knee Society Function score: NS; range of motion: NS


Wood 2002


(LoE 1)


92/128


Patella resurfaced (PRes) vs. patella not resurfaced (Cont)


Not reported


__


__


__


Pain


Anterior knee pain prevalence: PRes superior (p=0.016); Anterior knee pain severity:  PRes superior (p=0.005); Knee Society Pain score: NS


Functional outcomes


Knee Society Function score: NS; range of motion: NS; stair climbing: NS for anterior pain; stair descending (number of patients descending one at a time, leading with involved limb): PRes superiorNS (p=0.059), but clinically important


Re-operation


NS